Ask any scientist, bookie, logistician or crackhead... actuality always transcends probability. Ergo, the chicken (actuality) came before the egg (probability).
It can truly be said that art imitates life. There undeniably exists a basis for any given inspiration. But inspiration in of itself cannot create action, only the motivation for said possible action(s). One depends on the other. Of course, once any action has been initiated, the cycle between thought and deed can be eternal, eventually making the origin difficult to decipher.
But believe me, art imitates life.
1 comment:
It sounds like you're asking "How random is random?".
It makes sense though... even thoughts and inspirations that seem sudden and without cause... would have been sub-consciously triggered by some other train of thought... in turn triggered by some ACTUAL stimulus (seeing a bird, eating a hot pepper, having an apple fall on your head...).
Post a Comment